(DOWNLOAD) "Great American Indemnity Co. v. Fleniken" by United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit * Book PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Great American Indemnity Co. v. Fleniken
- Author : United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Release Date : January 01, 1943
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 66 KB
Description
Brought directly against the insurer of the Capital City Press, the suit was for damages for personal injuries caused by an automobile driven by one Robert Neyland while delivering to subscribers papers published by the Press. Brought under Louisiana statutes, which authorize the action not as a matter of substantive right but of procedure, Mock v. Maryland Casualty Co., La.App., 6 So.2d 199, and, therefore, do not render the insurer liable in any case in which the named insured would not be, recovery depended upon whether a case of liability against the Press was made out. The claim was that Neyland, who was driving the car for Ewell, a regular carrier on that route, was an employee of the Capital City Press, and, therefore, a person for whose negligence it was liable. The defendant vouched in as third party defendants, first, United Employers Casualty Company, and, next, the Wm. Wolf Bakery, Inc., and that company in turn vouched in the Press. There was a trial to a jury, a motion of the third party defendants and of the defendant appellant for a verdict on the ground that the evidence had not shown that Neyland was a servant either of the Press or of the Bakery for whose acts in driving the car they would be liable, but that quite to the contrary, it had shown that he was not employed by or working for them at all; that he was not their servant but an employee of an independent contractor whose activities in driving the automobile neither the Press nor the Bakery could or did control or supervise. The Bakerys motion was granted, and it, and all the other defendants brought in by, and as a result of, the third party proceedings, were dismissed from the case. Defendant appellants motion was denied, and plaintiff had a verdict for $20,000.00.